Per 
Item #: SCP-5002
Object Class: Euclid
Special Containment Procedures: SCP-5002 is a branch that is keep in 12 x 12 x 10 Containment at all time. there is a boy that cut the branch call SCP-5002-1. He cut the branch with a stick.SCP-5002-1 is know as the branch boy
Description: if a (1) D-class personnel go in SCP-5002 will run fast to the door and the speed is 99999. when you blink and look away when SCP-5002-1 gone SCP-5002-1 he will cut the tree fast and you can only see has leg not his body. it only work if you are fort of a tree or a branch. if you get close to it to a tree or a branch. SCP-5002 was discovered in 2011. when a man known as A███ S███████ suddenly and without warning violently expired at a cocktail party in uptown New York City. Mr. S███████ death was later found to coincide perfectly with the moment a party attendee leaving the home mistakenly backed over S███████'s kid. Special Agent F█████ had stepped outside to smoke a cigarette when he heard "a cute lil'sound". SCP-5002-1 Agent F█████ reported difficulty in supporting SCP-5002. he was cute kid in the would. in 5/17/2020 he got a stick and cut the tree down. his boys say E█████ what are you doing and he run so fast and the boys was like HOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. one day his boys blink and look away and they saw a leg. one day Dr. █████ got SCP-5002-1 for testing. (1) D-class personnel got in the Containment cell. here are log. Of course we all know SCP-5002-1 is the best, but it's just too short of a read! I don't know if this has been proposed before, but I want to get some opinions on the creation of a test log for SCP-5002-1 . I figure this would be best left up to a more experienced member should it be agreed upon. What is there TO test? Not a lot of unknowns to its abilities that need to be explored. Maybe if it is being filmed, but with the test results not varying that much from 'neck broken,' 'no movement' with a possible [DATA EXPUNGED], not a lot of meat for a test log.As was said earlier, what is there to test? Does he prefer to cut tree from the right? Or the left? Does he break in-animate things?
SCP-5002-1 is a classic. It shouldn't be changed, and it won't. I don't see any more supplementary work being added, unless it's in the form of tales.…it is? Rating-wise, maybe, but although it's the classic "original" and next SCP it's not nearly as interesting as, say, the Ships that Pass in the Night or Dial-a-Llama or Beauremont who wants HUMANS TO GO HOME.
Besides, I think it'd be up to the author to decide whether or not to make a test log. This. As far as I know, the only input on site content that staff gets is deletion due to hitting at least -10 or as unfinished, troll, or objectively obscene articles (which usually get called a troll.) And anyone can clean up grammar/spelling, after a discussion with staff and/or the author. Otherwise, the author gets final say in what is put into their article, no matter how popular or unpopular it is.
Is the original author of 173 known SCP-5002-1 What say does the original author have over supplemental materials? Regardless, as I understand it, since 173 is a Heritage article, any modifications to the article itself have to go through the rewrite team, which, IIRC, is all staff.
Edit: Quick check of the tag guide says that unless written by the original author or with their permission (or presumably the rewrite team if the original author is lost to time/gone), it can't be a supplement, merely a tale, like Revised Entry.If you want an idea to be taken seriously, I'd advise you not to speak for all users like that. Many might disagree vehemently with that statement.
You can add my voice to the chorus of "why?". There isn't anything to test, unless you want to test different ways to get 173 to return to his better days as a chocolate pudding generator and castanet prodigy. If that's the case, then you have my axe.
Didn't mean to start a war. It was a proposal. I feel like I've been shot in the face here.
Don't worry about it. It's happened to the best of us.
No need to mistake bluntness for personal attacks on you. Nobody's upset or mad about the proposal, we just don't see a need for it.
You didn't. I don't see any fighting going on here.
If you feel that the discussion has been played out, I can lock the thread for you.
