SCP-XXXX: "Yeah, no, yeah."
Author: Milo DeFrisco
Item#: SCP-XXXX
Object Class: Keter
Special Containment Procedures: SCP-XXXX is currently not able to be contained. All SCP-XXXX-2 instances under Foundation control should be quarantined inside of standard human containment cell, and provided basic amenities in the form of written entertainment. All researchers attempting to experiment with SCP-XXXX are to maintain a distance of 3 meters from the anomaly at all times. The use of sound-cancelling devices are mandatory for all personnel attempting to access SCP-XXXX.1 Any exposure to an instance of SCP-XXXX-2's should be limited to no longer than 5 hours within a 96 hour period. Each researcher assigned to SCP-XXXX should carry a handwritten note from themselves detailing how the phrase "Yeah, no, yeah" makes no sense. On request of other staff, researchers are to read their note, should they show symptoms of SCP-XXXX.
Description: SCP-XXXX is a memetic linguistic concept. SCP-XXXX is mostly present in the state of California. SCP-XXXX has appeared in other locations in the United States as well as outside of the North-American continent; however, these cases show no memetic properties. First reported sightings of SCP-XXXX are projected to have begun in the mid 1990's. SCP-XXXX and SCP-XXXX-2 have been accepted into the common vernacular of the California culture, and so removal via Class-D amnestics or higher has been denied.
After coming into close contact with SCP-XXXX and SCP-XXXX-2 instances, humans then become instances of SCP-XXXX-2. It is currently unknown as to how SCP-XXXX transmits between hosts hypothesized that physical proximity from SCP-XXXX-2 instances is the primary vector of SCP-XXXX. Without the physical element, vocal exposure has shown to mostly form a non-memetic instance. Written forms of SCP-XXXX have shown no memetic properties.
The base symptoms of SCP-XXXX are small in quantity, and currently no symptoms are lethal symptoms are only lethal if the subject has a loss of control in the prefrontal cortex. On it's own, SCP-XXXX is not lethal, and does not hinder normal functions. The most common symptom is a breach in pragmatics involving the phrase: "yeah, no, yeah", or some derivative. All cases of SCP-XXXX seem involuntary, and in severe cases seem painful to the subjects. Other common forms of SCP-XXXX are:
- "Yeah, yeah, no"
- "Yeah, no, no, no"
- "Yeah, no"
- "Yeah, no, no, yeah"
- "No, yeah"
- "No, yeah, no"
- "No, no, Yeah"
The possible permutations of SCP-XXXX are on average 3 to 5 words. on average 3 to 5 words long;however, the length of the instances can be potentially endless. The deeper meaning, if any, of SCP-XXXX is currently under investigation, but several common traits have been found:
- SCP-XXXX-2 instances do not seem aware of SCP-XXXX, the contradictory nature of its phrasing, or how it breaches general pragmatics.
- The number of the words "yeah" and "no" have little bearing on the end meaning, but whichever word is in the majority does influence the intended meaning to a certain degree.
- The first and last words of each instance influences the end meaning, but is not the deciding factor.
- The longer an instance of SCP-XXXX is, the less the above "rules" apply. Most instances are within 5 words, with some exception.
- Tone and body language seem to be the determining factors. However, similar to most of the above findings, this point is dependent on conversational context and later affirmation or denial of true meaning.
The following logs are snippets from interviews with instances of SCP-XXXX-2, performed by Dr. Milagros.
[REDACTED FOR BREVITY]2
Memetic nature of SCP-XXXX, as well as vector logged, and description edited. Further testing was then postponed on Dr. Mauro's orders on 07/08/2005, pending new interview procedures, and a shift in focus for future tests. Testing resumed 09/04/2006. Time in-between testing dates attributed to "lack of funding and interest", as well as "other testing taking priority.3”
The following are snippets from interviews with instances of SCP-XXXX-2, performed by Dr. Mauro with Dr. █████ assisting.
Following the events of testing on 09/06/2006, Dr. Mauro has been removed from the research team for SCP-XXXX by order of O5-██. Due to the non-harmful nature of SCP-XXXX, and Dr. Milagros' private findings while in quarantine on combating SCP-XXXX, Dr. Milagros was released from quarantine, and put back on the research team as the acting lead, by order of O5-██. Further testing of SCP-XXXX and SCP-XXXX-2 is not currenty approved by the 05 council. Upon Dr. Milagros' orders, SCP-XXXX's containment procedures are to be updated with his personal findings.
On order of the site director and O5-██, both Dr. Mauro and Dr. Milagros were placed on mandatory leave and probation. After psych evaluations, 2 seminars on proper handling of resources, and 2 seminar on workplace behavior, both were allowed to continue research on 11/05/2006, with the addition of strikes to their records.
Note 1: "I'm not really sure why I was quarantined for so long. Studies show that SCP-XXXX-2 instances are harmless without EXTREME tampering. My thanks to Dr. Mauro for LOCKING ME UP, and then proving later that my quarantine was completely unnecessary. If Dr. Mauro had done just a bit more research into HINDERING SCP-XXXX, they would have realized locking me up was useless." - Dr. Milagros, 1 day after his release from quarantine.
Addendum 1: There have been 58 recorded combinations of "yeah" and "no" in instances of SCP-XXXX-2. Due to some phrases exceeding a previously assumed word cap of 25, this is not considered the maximum word permutations available but more of an average figure.
Addendum 2: Concerns have been expressed towards the nature of SCP-XXXX as a breach in linguistic capabilities. Dr. Mauro has noted the possibility of SCP-XXXX's analogous properties "evolving" to cause subjects to lose control of their prefrontal cortex. Any actions regarding these concerns has been shut down by O5-██. O5-██ does however note that they are aware of these concerns and will be mindful of them in the future.
STATEMENT FROM THE O5 COUNCIL
The Foundation is not the place for clear misuse of time and resources. The purpose of the Foundation is a serious matter. The Foundation is a place where even small mistakes can result in consequences such as death to personnel, catastrophic breaches, and even an AK-Class-end-of-the-world-scenario. We believe that it will not be necessary to remind staff members that there is a precedent of demotion or even termination for staff members who display clear mishandling of any SCP or its associated testing.






Per 


