This is my staff box. Don't worry about it.
Currently on:
- Licensing
Thing | Contributed |
---|---|
Image Inquiry | PMs sent, images dealt with. |
Licensing help in IRC | |
[https://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/collab:cc40images CC 4.0 Images | Leading and going through old Castrated and Replaced sandboxes to find 4.0 Images used on site. |
Permission Grated Images | Leading and going through old Castrated and Replaced sandboxes to find Permission granted Images used on site |
Reporting and sending PMs to those using SCP without including CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
Helping finishing up older license boxing | Exactly what it says |
That's it lol.
Kara's on staff and only sometimes does her job? Blasphemy!!!
- JS on Site Crit Team (O' Doom),
- JS on CO Seminars Team (O' Doom),
- JS on Licensing (O' Doom),
- JS on Forum Crit Team (O’ Doom)
OLD Staff Stuff Below.
SCP's
5120:
This feels a bit too long to get your point across when it could be a lot shorter and work out a lot better. Over all, the flow is practically non-existent and the drop downs felt redundant at best. There wasn't much important information given, and when there was, it was bogged down by irrelevant information or testing logs that prove nothing beyond information in the description.
I can tell you were trying to hit emotional beats, but those didn't hit because of the irrelevant information given. A lot of it could be cut and this would have the same idea and would probably give a more emotional hit at the end. It feels like its trying to be "When Day Breaks" but as a regular SCP. That isn't bad in itself, but when its in this context it isn't going over well.
For this to be a +1 from me, it would need a major overhaul from what it is now. As much as I would like to like this, its too long and I couldn't really get into it beyond the small sections where it is interesting and compelling. I hope to see this again, and I hope you keep writing.
5070:
Hey author, voters are not obligated to give critique on your work after you posted it. It was your job to get critique on your work before you posted via the Idea Critique Forum and the IRC Chats.
As for crit.
SCP-5070 is to be kept in a 10x10x10 Square Meter containment cube that is reinforced and 10 feet thick this will contain the creature unless it is aided in another SCP or by an inside man.
That's very very long and a bit confusing.
In the event of a containment breach MTF unit ALPHA-58 is to be dispatched an is to contain the entity by knocking it out VIA the use of a cannon and other large projectile based weapons, Once unconscious SCP-5070 is to be moved back into its cell at Site-19.
Why? Why not just have the normal group fix the mess? Why would it want out?
SCP-5070 is a hexopedal entity that is completely covered in crustacean like armor, With a body-style of an alligator and also similar to that of a mole.
Should be "hexapedal" also, capitalization error.
SCP-5070 supports a large armored crown positioned on the head of the entity that allows it to shield its cranium and burrow several feet underground to hide from and ambush opponents and then use its crown to attack the opponent with brute force.
Run on sentence, doesn't flow well. Would break it up to something like this: "SCP-5070 has a large armored crown on its head. This allows it to shield its cranium and burrow several feet underground, often using it to ambush opponents."
SCP-5070s muscles are highly strengthened by its "Molten Blood" this occurs due to the blood breaking down and re-growing the muscles of the entity this process makes the entity's muceles grow in strength at a rate of 3.7x each year.
What the hell is "Molten Blood"? Why does it strengthen its muscles? Also, missing an apostrophe in "SCP-5070's"
SCP-5070 also supports a barbed tail that can be used as a spear or sword and even shot spines from its tail like a bow.
Why is it supporting these things? Does it not have them as apart of it? Also, why use "Shot" in a present tense sentence?
Is shot barbs at use all killing most of us I was the only survivor I ran, I ran my ass off and got back to site-843.
Shouldn't it be something more like this? "It shot barbs at us, all killing most of us. I was the only survivor. I ran, I ran my ass off and got back to site-843." The sentence goes on forever. Honestly, the entire ending interview is like that sentence and just isn't good.
Everything mixed with the SPaG issues and clinical tone failure have made this kind of eh. It reads like a series one SCP, which is a style we don't use onsite anymore. To fix this, I would suggest getting crit before posting as well as taking a look at series 5 and 6. As a note, I would recommend actually formatting interviews as in the How To Write An SCP Guide. This didn't do anything interesting with the concept and just left off with eh dialogue that reads forced and fake. This was a -1 from me.
5179
Alright, so there wasn't much wrong with this in terms of writing ability and quality per-se, but I'm also not great with SPaG without extreme help. Though for me, it was more the issue with not knowing what is really going on (it feels like the SCP doesn't know where it wants to go) as well how how dado talks. I found a few uppercase letters in there, and over all, dado seemed a bit out of character. Beyond that, there wasn't much characterization to dado and why hes doing this (Beyond the one line in the dialogue), or anything else to keep the reader engaged beyond the idea of writing sub-par work and getting amazing results. The ending didn't feel like an ending, it just abruptly cut off without any reason or satisfying thing to it. There wasn't a story here or much else to keep readers engaged. I love dado articles but this just felt incredibly off from the typical style of them.
As much as I really wanted to like this, but this just didn't do it for me. -1
5883
Howdy hey!
I'm Kara!
SCP-5883 is to be kept in a small granite container (10 x 10), when in containment. SCP-5883 is to be kept in Site-██, until executive orders to move SCP-5883, are order by Site Administrator. Foundation Staff // Via, Research Staff, Facility Guards, ETC require a keycard clearance of 2+.
The second sentence is a little odd. It abruptly ends and feels like it was picked up in the next sentence. Why was it not already moved to the containment area it was meant to be in? Also, what are the //?
SCP-5883 is a wooden picture frame, that appears to be black in color, and highly worn (Giving the impression to Foundation Staff that the picture frame is probably old.) Upon setting eyes on SCP-5883, subject will begin to feel effects as of "Confusion, and being unable to remember certain events // facts."
The part in parenthesis isn't needed, that could have been inferred from the sentence before it (which is also missing a period.) Anyway, what is with the quotation marks?
Final notes:
This is kinda eh, there isn't any information on the anomaly given in a meaningful way, and what is given is bogged down my SPaG errors and unnecessary redactions. I would suggest using our Idea Critique Forum and our IRC Chats. These help prepare authors to post to the site. For clinical tone, I personally enjoy the Clinical Tone Declass for first time authors.
Tales
Same As It Ever Was:
Howdy hey author!
I'm Kara, JS on the Site Crit team.
So, a lot of my issues with this tale stem from the fact that its a bit short and just feels like nothing really happens? From the start I could tell the tale was just gonna go the direction I thought it was, which would have been fine had you taken the time in the tale to work with the situation. This just felt rushed from the writing perspective and that hurts the perspective of the main character. I would also like to say that the first part being in the present tense just made it annoying and confusing. There was a lot of times where the tenses split and made reading quite hard.
Over all this kind of just made me confused and not grow a connection with the character. I feel if you took more time to flesh out what he's feeling and how he's acting it would remedy that. It kind of mixes with the word you use that just kind of mean the same thing. "If he inundated them with information they would be so overwhelmed that they would send him to another room while they compare notes." That is an example.
This could have been a really fun format screw if it was an SCP, but this just didn't do it for me. Sorry, -1. Good luck in future works, and I hope this one works out.
Other?
Thing | Contributed |
---|---|
2019 Survey | Sorting data |
Inviting to Seminars (Welcome to the Wiki) | 200 PMs sent and welcomed new users to the site. |
Inviting people to host seminars | Reached out to a handful of people |
Helping potential seminar hosts with planning and other logistical stuffs | What is says before |
Looking after the October Seminar | Just chilling, helping Aki where needed in chat. |
Notes for Oct Seminar | Notes. As it says! |
Collections | 180 listed |
Things | Contributed |
---|---|
Castrated and Replaced S1 | Double checking the previous work/checking again. |
Castrated and Replaced S2 | All S2 in that SB |
Castrated and Replaced S4 | 3500-3999 S4 in that SB |
Castrated and Replaced S4 | License Boxes |
SCP-INT | _license on things that did not have them |
Contacting -INT authors about photos | Almost all of them came back as non-CC |
Contacting -EN authors about photos | All came back CC Compliant! |
9 day _CC license box/compliance check | Did my own 8 days, took on Cerastes’s and WG/UC's and helped Hex, and CT. Took over 3 months |
More PMs | Some did not come back at all. Passed to N_Aepic_Fael does not match any existing user name |
Minecraft Mod Packs | http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/karaslicensebox |
Etsy | http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/collab:wg-and-cg-s-licensebox |
Look at my comment history.
Flights
- July Flight,
chiifu passed.
- August Flight, Benji_the_Benevolent does not match any existing user name passed.
- October Flight,
Cerastes passed.
- November Flight,
EthanHanson passed.
- February Flight,
Projects I’m working on
http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/karakatt-s-proposal
http://the-playground-sandbox.wikidot.com/forum/t-13796210/thecritters-reborn
O5 stuffs
Date | Link | Note: |
---|---|---|
12 Aug 2020, 10:47 | link | N/A |
26 Aug 2020 | Collections | I wrote 770 words on this, mostly amounting to "I agree, but…" |
2 Sep 2020, 20:57 | link | N/A |
7 Sep 2020, 21:05 | link | N/A |
14 Sep 2020, 19:03 | link | N/A |
--[Placeholder o' Doom!!! Will crit within 24 hours]--
Howdy hey!
I'm [[*user Karablue9482]] and today I'll drop a little crit for ya!
[[collapsible show="+ Line by line and general thoughts." hide="- ..."]]
+ Questions I Have While Reading Through
>
----
+ final notes
Good luck!
[[/collapsible]]
[[*user USER]],
As outlined in the [http://www.scp-wiki.net/site-rules Rules], **please do not post entire drafts to the forum.** Instead, go to the [http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com SCP Sandbox Wiki], create a single page with your username as the page name, and link that in your thread.
Author,
As per the [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-12255912/how-to-use-this-forum-drafts-critique How to use this forum] thread at the top of this forum:
> If you're a first-time author, remember to provide a direct link to/information for your two ##green|greenlights##!
If you have not yet received greenlights, please proceed to the [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/c-89000/help:ideas-critique ideas forum] and follow the guidelines set in the [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13095662/required-reading:how-to-use-this-forum-ideas required reading].
Thank you.
Author,
Per the [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13095662/required-reading:how-to-use-this-forum-ideas required reading forum guidelines,] please fill out the concept template to seek feedback on your idea:
[[code]]
**Seeking Greenlights:** Put yes or no.
**Page Type:** SCP Article, Tale, GoI Format, Joke SCP, Site Dossier, Other (specify)
**Genre (Optional):** Horror, Drama/Emotional, Comedy, Action, History, Other (specify)
**Page Layout (Optional):** [How will you will structure the page in terms of information presentation, or plot development? If you plan on using a unique format/format screw, describe that here.]
**Elevator Pitch:** [What is the basic core idea? Use a bullet point list if necessary.]
**Central Narrative:** [Describe the story beats or overarching context/"big picture" for your piece. If there is no story content, put "none".]
**Hook/Attention-Grabber:** [What is novel/unique about your premise? What is special about your idea here that will make it stand out among the other works already on the mainsite?]
**Additional Notes:** [Note any concerns or particular areas of assistance you would like reviewers to focus on.]
[[/code]]
Rather than posting a new comment, **edit your previous post using the "edit" function under the "options" tab to the lower right of your first comment.**
Remember that the combined text for your answers to the last four sections (Elevator Pitch, Central Narrative, Hook/Attention-Grabber, and Additional Notes) MAY NOT exceed 400 words. For convenience, authors can use this page to check wordcount: https://wordcounter.net/
Once you have revised your post accordingly, please reach out to reviewers to request that they look at your thread. You can find example lists of contacts in the Required Reading thread linked above.
Author, per the required forum guidelines:
> Do not link to a sandbox unless a reviewer asks to see a draft.
Instead, please use the standardized template for concepts found here: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13282684/required-reading:how-to-use-this-forum-ideas
Additionally, please do not copy-paste portions of a sandbox draft into the template in lieu of actually filling out the sections. If you are unsure of what the post should look like, look around other threads within this forum.
Once you have reviewed the guidelines, please edit your post to the correct format rather than creating a new thread, and if you are having trouble editing, click the "edit" function under the "options" tab to the lower right of your post. Please feel free to then reach out to a reviewer for your concept: http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-13282692/how-to-get-more-reviews
Noting that this user already has a thread for this idea here:
Author, as stated in the Required Reading, do not create a new thread for a concept already on the forum, unless the thread has not been posted on in 14 days or longer. If you wish to make changes to your concept, please edit the original thread instead of creating a new one.
Howdy hey [[*user ]],
[http://www.scp-wiki.net/criticism-policy As per the site Criticism Policy], **forum critique should be relatively in-depth.** Please edit your post to give the author a clearer direction to follow and note how your suggestions will improve their material. If you are unsure about approaching a more in-depth critique, feel free to let an experienced reviewer respond first so your critique can build on theirs.
For more information on giving critique in the Ideas Critique forum, [http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-9804362/so-you-want-to-be-a-concept-reviewer please look at this thread].
----
Author,
I suggest reaching out to someone on the [http://www.scp-wiki.net/butterfly-squad-roster Butterfly Squad Roster] to seek additional critique on your idea.
Thank you.
Author,
per the required reading:
> The combined text of the last four sections of the template may not exceed 400 words.
Your post is about 375 words over the limit. Rather than posting a new comment, please edit your previous post using the "edit" function under the "options" tab to the lower right of your first comment. For convenience, authors can use this page to check wordcount: https://wordcounter.net/
Site Crit Things.
Howdy hey!!
I'm [[*user KaraKatt]] and I'll be doing a crit of this piece today.
[[collapsible show="+ Crit" hide="- Crit"]]
+++ SPaG
----
+++ Consistency + Flow
----
+++ Overall thoughts
[[/collapsible]]
Thank you for posting!
[[size smaller]]**Disclaimer:** //Opinions expressed in this review do not reflect the opinions of SCP Wiki staff as a whole. Please respond to [[*user KaraKatt]] or contact the captain of the Site Criticism Team, [[*user SoullessSingularity]], for any questions or concerns relating to this review.//[[/size]]
Howdy hey!
As stated before posting:
> Remember: The main site is for summary judgment of final work, not feedback and critique on unfinished work.
>
> It is your responsibility to post only finished, final work. Site members are not required to justify or explain their votes.
It was your responsibility to get critique in the [http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/c-89000/help:ideas-critique Idea Critique Forum] and our [http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/chat-guide IRC Chat] before posting. Please keep this in mind before trying again.
Other Corpy Corstors: http://scp-sandbox-3.wikidot.com/collab:riemann-kara-copy-stuffs