Per 
Entropic Threshold (ET) values
0 – Inert. Subject is entropy-immune and is an immutable constant. Subject is unreactive, does not respond to stimuli, and is unaware of observation. Reactions can be consistently predicted and manipulated following observation but not theoretically or mathematically.
1 – Reactive. Subject is reactive, does not respond to stimuli, and is unaware of observation. Reactions can be consistently predicted or manipulated following observation. Reactions can be consistently predicted or manipulated theoretically and mathematically.
2 – Complex. Subject is reactive and responds to stimuli, but is unaware of observation. Reactions can be consistently predicted or manipulated following observation. Reactions can be consistently predicted or manipulated theoretically and mathematically.
3 – Sentient. Subject responds to stimuli, and is aware of observation. Subject is unable to proactively react to its knowledge of being observed. Reactions cannot be consistently predicted or manipulated theoretically or mathematically. Reactions can be predicted or manipulated following observation.
4 – Intelligent. Subject responds to stimuli and is aware of observation. Subject is capable of proactively reacting to its knowledge of being observed. Reactions cannot be consistently predicted or manipulated theoretically or mathematically. Reactions cannot be consistently predicted or manipulated following observation.
4.1 – Pseudorandom. Subject does not appear to consistently nor coherently react to stimuli but has been shown to be aware of observation. (Assume observer information gap)
5 – Random. True random number generators. Subject is reactive and responsive to stimuli only upon observation. Reactions cannot be predicted or manipulated theoretically or mathematically. Reactions cannot be consistently predicted or manipulated following observation.
6 – False Entropic. Subject is reactive to its own awareness of observation but is not reactive to stimuli. Direct attempts at containment with static protocols elicit anomalous reactions. Protocol must be changed randomly on an irregular basis. Awareness can be consistently manipulated mathematically.
6.1 – Awareness can be consistently manipulated via pseudo-random means such as coin-flips and random number generators.
6.2 – Awareness cannot be consistently manipulated via pseudo-random means. Awareness can be consistently manipulated via true random number generators. Utilize random number generators of an Entropic Threshold of exactly 5.
7 – True Entropic. Subject is reactive to its own awareness of observation and in the presence of extant entropic systems but does not respond to stimuli. Direct attempts at containment with static protocols elicit anomalous reactions. Attempts at containment using information derived from outside systems elicit anomalous reactions. Awareness cannot be manipulated mathematically. Refer to X Protocol for general guidelines.
