Limey(y)
SCP-XXXX

Directly above this message is a photograph of SCP-XXXX.

rating: 0+x

Item #: SCP-XXXX

Object Class: Safe

Special Containment Procedures: SCP-XXXX is contained in a standard storage locker in Secure Site 73. It should not be held 10 meters of any other anomalous objects. A minimum of two access level 4 or higher personnel, including the Site Director of Secure Site 73, must be actively reminded of the existence of SCP-XXXX on a regular basis. This is currently delivered via an automated email to assigned personnel on a daily basis. The current location of SCP-XXXX is to be stored in no less than 3 separate servers, at least one off-site. All information pertaining to SCP-XXXX is to be preceded by a standardised message denoting its properties.

In the event of a security breach, all recovery agents directed to Secure Site 73 are to be informed of the last known location, and memetic properties of SCP-XXXX. In the event that the object cannot be relocated, a large scale search of the site for it is to be considered a high priority action once emergency protocols are lifted.

Description: SCP-XXXX is an ovoid shaped orange rock with an irregular white speckled pattern across the entire surface, approximately 35cm long from base to tip. SCP-XXXX's anomalous effect manifests as a minor compulsion affecting all those who observe it either directly or through recorded mediums, extending to information directly regarding the object. Affected individuals show a sense of disinterest in SCP-XXXX and a volume of approximately 5 metres cubed surrounding it, the strength of which is inconsistent but invariably results in subjects ignoring the object and area surrounding it without third party intervention. This effect is not antimemetic in nature - all who come into contact with SCP-XXXX can recall the event given external prompting, but will not do so without it.

Discovery: On 05/07/2015, Containment Specialist Luis Elliot reported an assault by Agent William Stephens within Elliot's onsite accommodation, Room 410, in Secure Site 45, described by both to be instigated by a disagreement over a mutual romantic interest. In the following incident inquiry it was discovered that several nearby personnel should have been able to hear and subsequently report the event, but did not. Assuming anomalous circumstance, all involved parties were interrogated and found clear of any cognitohazardous influence, the inquiry focused on a review of Elliot's housing. Stephens was reprimanded for his actions during Incident XXXX/05.07.2015

On 11/07/2015, a 1x1x1m unlocked steel cabinet containing SCP-XXXX embedded in the wall inside the shower was discovered by Agent Elizabeth English, assigned to the investigation. This is widely considered a coincidence and has been hypothesised to be as a result of multiple factors:

  1. Agent English was directly ordered by a superior officer to investigate the area, acting as a weak third party intervention towards recognition of the object,
  2. Agent English was found to be in the 10th percentile of the memetic resistance index,
  3. Traces of amphetamines were found in a blood sample of Agent English in a regular screening on 23/02/2016, raising the possibility that her awareness of her surroundings was heightened via cognitive enhancing stimulants during the incident.

Addendum:




























Not part of the article just personal notes I don't wanna delete yet

The discovery of an unrecorded anomalous object built into a facility secure site constitutes a major security breach, and as a response, an immediate investigation of SCP-XXXX's origins was commissioned by the O5 council under the guidance of Senior Researcher Yoshinori Okamura at a level 1 priority. Excerpts of the investigation deemed relevant can be found below.

testing log? reinforce idea that it is minor and affects people differently - could be irrelevant and make article needlessly long

room owner is questioned, no idea. Internal panic as it proves foundation was unaware of something anomalous already in site

story follows internal investigation:

Preliminary investigation finds object has no negative effects. Use as weapon against foundation incredibly unlikely

earliest date: staff quarters building - 1940s? Floorplan denies existence of the area

-funding requisition form for project not found - found to be within ballpark of contructing area with object

-interview with room owner - inconclusive, vague 'it's always been there' which implies but does not confirm pre user moving in (2015 as working date)

eventually wears it down to a 2 week gap in some mid 70s-90s year in face of overwhelming foundation recordings that narrow it down

spoiler for level 4+ staff:

Actual date is a 15ish year gap bewteen xx/xx/19xx and xx/xx/19xx (use actual dates when it comes to it). Foundation is clueless to any more detail. The idea that the foundation is not in control of it's own sites begs question of their influence and power, would prove negative to morale and is not relevant to current containment of object, so the truth is hidden to preserve faith in the foundation. Some heavy hitting last line or something.

https://sekreti-domovodstva.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/kak-pokrasit-yajca-na-pasxu29.jpg 2/9/2020

https://www.flickr.com/photos/48889099483@N01/505257424

critters: basircuser, boogey_man23