OCuin - Talebox
#page-content .collapsible-block { 
    position: relative;
    padding: 0.5em;
    margin: 0.5em;
    box-shadow: 2px 1.5px 1px rgba(176,16,0,0.7), 0 0 0px 1px lightgrey;
    overflow-wrap: break-word;
}
 
.collapsible-block-unfolded{
    color: black;
    overflow-wrap: break-word;
 
}
 
.collapsible-block-unfolded-link {
    text-align:center;
}
 
.collapsible-block-folded {
    text-align: center;
    color: dimgrey;
}
 
.collapsible-block-link {
    font-weight: bold;
    color: dimgrey;
    text-align: center;
}
 
.addendumbox {
    padding: .01em 16px;
    margin-bottom: 16px;
    margin-top: 16px;
    padding-bottom: 1em;
    box-shadow:0 2px 5px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.16),0 2px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.12);
}
 
.material-box {
    padding: .01em 16px;
    margin-bottom: 16px;
    margin-top: 16px;
    padding-bottom: 1em;
    border: 1px lightgrey solid;
    box-shadow: 1px 2px 2px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.16);
}
 
.material-box blockquote {
    border: 1px double #999;
}
 
.wiki-content-table {
    width: 100%;
}
 
.addendumbox blockquote {
    border: 1px double #999;
}
 
.addendumtitle {
   opacity: 0.8;
   margin-bottom: 10px;
   color: #b01;
}
 
.maintitle {
   margin-bottom: 10px;
   color: black;
}
 
.scp-header {
    text-align: center;
    font-size:x-large;
    color:#b01;
}
 
.addenda-header {
    width: 100%;
    border-bottom: 2px black solid;
    color: black;
}
 
.scp-info {
    display:flex;
    justify-content:space-between;
    font-size:large;
}
 
.scp-info-box {
    display:flex; 
    justify-content:space-between;
}
 
.object-info {
    color:black;
    align-self: flex-end;
    font-size: large;
}
 
.title-style {
    opacity: 0.8;
    margin-bottom: 10px;
    color: #b01;
    font-size: large;
    text-decoration: underline;
    font-weight: bold;
}
 
.update-div-empty {
    text-align: right;
    font-size: x-small;
    color: lightgrey;
}
 
.update-div {
    text-align: right;
    font-size: x-small;
}
 
.computed {
    border: 1px black solid;
    width: 50%;
    display: inline-block;
text-align: left;
    padding: 3px;
}
.computed:before {
    content:"Computed Code";
    font-weight: bold;
border-bottom: solid 1px black;
width: 100%;
}
.rawcode {
    border: black solid 1px;
    width: 50%;
    display: inline-block;
text-align: left;
    padding: 3px;
}
.rawcode:before{
    content:"Raw Code";
    text-align: center;
    font-weight: bold;
border-bottom: solid 1px black;
width: 100%;
}
.codebox {
    display: inline-block;
    width: 100%;
    text-align: center;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav .selected a em,  .yui-navset .yui-nav a em{
        padding: 0.25em .75em; 
        top: 0px;
        margin-bottom: 0px;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav .selected a {
     background: gray;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav .selected {
       margin: 0px;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav .selected a, .yui-navset .yui-nav .selected a:focus, .yui-navset .yui-nav .selected a:hover, .yui-navset .yui-nav .selected a {
         background: gray;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav a:hover,
.yui-navset .yui-nav a:focus {
    background: gainsboro;
    text-decoration: none;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav a, .yui-navset .yui-navset-top .yui-nav a {
background-color: none;
background-image: none;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav a {
background: none;
}
.yui-navset .yui-nav li{
margin: 0px;
}
 
#page-content .licensebox .collapsible-block {
    position: unset;
    padding: unset;
    margin: unset;
    box-shadow: unset;
}
 
.licensebox .collapsible-block-unfolded{
    color: inherit;
}
 
.licensebox .collapsible-block-unfolded-link {
    text-align: left;
}
 
.licensebox .collapsible-block-folded {
    text-align: left;
    color: inherit;
}
 
.licensebox .collapsible-block-link {
    color: inherit;
    text-align: left;
}

Summary: This thread proposes that the current method of non-disciplinary record-keeping be replaced with a version private to staff to prevent public branding of users over minor mistakes.

The Problem: Non-discs are often used as record-keeping for staff to ensure 1) our actions are transparent, and 2) to keep an eye on users who may eventually need disc intervention. This is very useful to staff and helps us in keeping the site working smoothly, whilst speeding up disc proceedings where they become necessary. However, a number of users have expressed (and this was to a degree already known), that non-discs, particularly over very minor things such as post-signing, can often feel like being branded for the rest of their time on site. Additionally, the vast majority of non-discs never even receive a second post, never mind a disc thread, and as such this kind of public record-keeping often does not serve a long term purpose.

The Solution: There are a number of options I see that will allow us to maintain the utility of a non-disc thread without branding users before they've had a chance to integrate into the site. I've listed a number of options I believe are viable below:

Option 1: Replace non-discs with record-keeping on a private wiki only accessible to staff members. Whilst there is a degree of transparency lost here, it ensures that users are no longer branded for minor infractions. If a user receives a disc thread, the contents of the non-disc are made public on O5 in the disc thread as well as the infraction that led to the disc thread. Users may request their non-discs be released to them in full at any time and staff must comply.

Option 1a: Instead of creating a new private wiki, staff create a new page category on O5 that can only be accessed by site members that would be used to store non-disc records. This would prevent the creation of a new wiki or process, but may be unwieldy, as each non-disc record would require an entire new page of its own.

Option 2: Staff use a tracker such as that proposed in the big project tab-keeping proposal to track non-discs and store the records. As with Option 1, this information would be released upon the creation of a disc thread and/or request.

Option 3: Keep things as they are - the impact of a non-disc is ultimately small and does not outwigh its benefits or the difficulty of finding a new method.

In order to facilitate this change, if Option 1 or 2 pass, the following section of text from the Site Charter would be modified:

If Option 1 passes, the text above will be modified to the following:

If Option 2 passes, the text will be modified to the following:

If Option 3 passes, the Site Charter will remain unchanged.

This discussion will run for one week at which point a vote will be held if there is no consensus on this policy. The discussion is open to staff of all levels, including JS.